Volume 1 Issue 1
March  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jan Lukas Storck, Guido Ehrmann, Jana Uthoff, Elise Diestelhorst, Tomasz Blachowicz, Andrea Ehrmann. Investigating inexpensive polymeric 3D printed materials under extreme thermal conditions[J]. Materials Futures, 2022, 1(1): 015001. doi: 10.1088/2752-5724/ac4beb
Citation: Jan Lukas Storck, Guido Ehrmann, Jana Uthoff, Elise Diestelhorst, Tomasz Blachowicz, Andrea Ehrmann. Investigating inexpensive polymeric 3D printed materials under extreme thermal conditions[J]. Materials Futures, 2022, 1(1): 015001. doi: 10.1088/2752-5724/ac4beb
Paper •
OPEN ACCESS

Investigating inexpensive polymeric 3D printed materials under extreme thermal conditions

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd on behalf of the Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory
Materials Futures, Volume 1, Number 1
  • Received Date: 2021-09-20
  • Accepted Date: 2022-01-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-01-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-16
  • 3D printing is nowadays used for many applications far beyond pure rapid prototyping. As tools to prepare custom-made objects which may be highly complex, different 3D printing techniques have emerged into areas of application where the mechanical, thermal, optical and other properties have to meet high requirements. Amongst them, applications for space, e.g. for microsatellites, make extreme demands regarding the stability under high temperatures. Nevertheless, polymeric 3D printed materials have several advantages for space application in comparison with metal objects. Here we thus investigate the impact of temperatures up to 85 C and 185 C, respectively, on typical 3D printing materials for fused deposition modeling or stereolithography (SLA) with inexpensive 3D printers. The materials are found to differ strongly in terms of mechanical properties and dimensional stability after the treatment at a higher temperature, with SLA resins and co-polyester showing the best dimensional stability, while acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene and SLA resin after long UV post-treatment has the best mechanical properties.
  • loading
  • Authors’ contributions

    Conceptualization, GE, TB and AE; formal analysis, AE; investigation, GE, JLS, JU, ED and AE; writingoriginal draft preparation, AE and TB; writingreview and editing, all authors; visualization, AE. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  • [1]
    Ben-Ner A, Siemsen E 2017 Calif. Manage. Rev. 59 5-23 doi: 10.1177/0008125617695284
    [2]
    Noorani R 2005 Rapid Prototyping: Principles and ApplicationsNYWiley
    [3]
    Chalgham A, Ehrmann A, Wickenkamp I 2021 Polymers 13 1239 doi: 10.3390/polym13081239
    [4]
    Chen Z, Zhao D H, Liu B H, Nian G D, Li X K, Yin J, Qu S X, Yang W 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900971 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201900971
    [5]
    Slmann S, Rattenholl A, Blattner H, Ehrmann G, Gudermann F, Ltkemeyer D, Ehrmann A 2021 AIMS Bioeng. 8 25-35 doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8020025
    [6]
    Ehrmann G, Ehrmann A 2021 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138 50847 doi: 10.1002/app.50847
    [7]
    Grski F, Wichniarek R, Kuczko W, Zukowska M, Lulkiewicz M, Zawadzki P 2020 Materials 13 4091 doi: 10.3390/ma13184091
    [8]
    Korger M, Bergschneider J, Lutz M, Mahltig B, Finsterbusch K, Rabe M 2016 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 141 012011 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/141/1/012011
    [9]
    Grothe T, Brockhagen B, Storck J L 2020 J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 15 15589250 20933440 doi: 10.1177/1558925020933440
    [10]
    Blachowicz T, Pajak K, Recha P, Ehrmann A 2020 AIMS Mater. Sci. 7 926-38 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.6.926
    [11]
    O’Reilly D, Herdrich G, Kavanagh D F 2021 Aerospace 8 22 doi: 10.3390/aerospace8010022
    [12]
    Schulte P Z, Spencer D A 2016 Acta Astronaut. 118 168-86 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.10.010
    [13]
    Valer J C, Roberts G, Chambers A, Owen J, Roberts M 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 3046-52 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2257730
    [14]
    Li L, Yang J C, Minton T K 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 6763-71 doi: 10.1021/jp0657843
    [15]
    Grossmann E, Gouzman I 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 208 48-57 doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00640-2
    [16]
    Abdullah F, Okuyaja K I, Morimitsu A, Yamagata N 2020 Aerospace 7 95 doi: 10.3390/aerospace7070095
    [17]
    Kafi A, et al 2020 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 137 49117 doi: 10.1002/app.49117
    [18]
    Duty C, Ajinjeru C, Kishore V, Compton B, Hmeidat N, Chen X, Liu P, Hassen A A, Lindahl J, Kunc V 2018 J. Manuf. Process. 35 526-37 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008
    [19]
    Costanzo A, Cavallo D, McIlroy C 2022 Addit. Manuf. 49 102474 doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102474
    [20]
    Kuang X, Zhao Z, Chen K J, Fang D N, Kang G Z, Qi H J 2018 Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39 1700809 doi: 10.1002/marc.201700809
    [21]
    Ji Z Y, Jiang D, Zhang X Q, Guo Y X, Wang X L 2020 Macromol. Rapid Commun. 41 2000064 doi: 10.1002/marc.202000064
    [22]
    Wu T, Jiang P, Ji Z Y, Guo Y X, Wang X L, Zhou F, Liu W M 2020 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 305 2000397 doi: 10.1002/mame.202000397
    [23]
    Layani M, Wang X F, Magdassi S 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1706344 doi: 10.1002/adma.201706344
    [24]
    Sirjani E, Cragg P J, Dymond M K 2019 Chem. Data Collect. 22 100244 doi: 10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100244
    [25]
    Geng P, Zhao J, Wu W Z, Wang Y L, Wang B F, Wang S B, Li G W 2018 Polymers 10 875 doi: 10.3390/polym10080875
    [26]
    Yang C, Tian X, Li D, Cao Y, Zhao F, Shi C 2017 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 248 1-7 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027
    [27]
    Jin L, Ball J, Bremner T, Sue H J 2014 Polymer 55 5255-65 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.045
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(9)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(727) PDF downloads(40)
    Article Statistics
    Related articles from

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return